
"NOW OPEN TO SERVE YOU"
Michael Chong, M.P.
Wellington-Halton Hills
Toll Free: (866) 878 5556
Email: Chong.M@parl.gc.ca
http://www.mikechong.ca/
Agriculture - Supply Management
Part 1 of 3
May 25th, 2005
OTTAWA -
Last year, Canada's 230,000 farms generated $3.5 billion in profit
on $36.5 billion in sales. While on first glance this may seem like
a healthy business, this is a sector in crisis. $3.5 billion in net
income, or profit, divided amongst 230,000 farms is an average
profit of $15,000 per farm. These numbers are even worse when you
realize that most farmers and their families don’t pay themselves,
and rely on their profit as "salary". In addition, farmers make
major investments in their farm businesses, and for many the return
on investment has been less than what a GIC would return. No wonder
many farmers often have to make ends meet by working off the farm.
Thirty years ago, in 1974, Canada's farming sector generated $3.8
billion in profit on $8.8 billion in sales (in 1974 dollars). In
2004 dollars that would be $15.4 billion profit on $35.7 billion in
sales. In other words, last year, farmers made only 1/4 the profit
they made 30 years ago, and last year was the best in the last five
for Canadian farmers. This drop in income during the last thirty
years has occurred despite the increase in population from 22 to 32
million, and despite the per capita growth in the economy.
Clearly, at a macro-economic level, Canada's agricultural policy
isn't working. However, the one sector of agriculture that is
working is that part under supply management, introduced by Eugene
Whalen in the early 1970s. Milk, eggs, chickens, turkeys, and
hatching eggs are all under supply management in Canada.
Supply management is a system where the market is managed by
government controls. The three essential pillars of this system are
production quotas, pricing controls and import controls. Supply
management is like a three-legged stool. Knock one of the three legs
out, and the whole system fails to work.
I support supply management because supply management works.
Consumers get a nutritious basket of high-quality products that are
among the least expensive in the world, produced by their friends
and neighbours. Governments have not had to spend billions to bail
out supply managed markets, like we have had to do for agriculture
in free-trade markets, since supply managed markets are insulated
from disruptive trade shocks. Finally, it allows the hard-working
family farm to receive their fair share of the supermarket price and
make a decent living and a stable income.
Unfortunately, there are two big threats to supply management.
First, the federal government has been using over quota tariffs
(i.e. import controls) as a bargaining chip at the WTO to win
concessions in other trade areas; in other words, they are
threatening one of the three pillars of supply management.
Governments should never play one sector of agriculture off of
another, but that is exactly what this government is doing. Second,
there are loopholes that allow food manufacturers to avoid the over
quota tariffs (import controls) by using blends to formulate their
products using imported milk, eggs, chicken, and turkeys, instead of
using Canadian products. This government has failed to protect
supply management by closing these loopholes. In Wellington-Halton
Hills, we have hundreds of farms that rely on supply management, and
this government's inaction on these two fronts is threatening their
very survival.
Supply management is one of the only bright spots in agriculture,
and this government needs to do more to protect a system that works
so well for consumers, governments, and farmers.
Interactive/comments ...